<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Musica Sacra&#8217;s 50th Anniversary Concert Offers Brahms Requiem with The Boston Cecilia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://classical-scene.com/2009/11/11/musica-sacras-50th-anniversary-concert-offers-brahms-requiem-with-the-boston-cecilia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://classical-scene.com/2009/11/11/musica-sacras-50th-anniversary-concert-offers-brahms-requiem-with-the-boston-cecilia/</link>
	<description>a virtual journal and blog of the classical music scene in Boston</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 09:55:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Turbessi</title>
		<link>http://classical-scene.com/2009/11/11/musica-sacras-50th-anniversary-concert-offers-brahms-requiem-with-the-boston-cecilia/comment-page-1/#comment-1140</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Turbessi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 01:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classical-scene.com/?p=1890#comment-1140</guid>
		<description>This is a rather forgiving review.  I was unable to attend the first half, but the Brahms was mediocre at best.  Although there was some very fine singing from choir and soloists, Beekman&#039;s conducting effectively ruined the work.  Tempi were odd and poorly informed, the program notes were badly written, long-winded, frequently simply untrue, and demonstrated a poor understanding of the work.  Many of the cutoffs simply didn&#039;t happen, leaving the choir to scatter helplessly at cadences.  I appreciate that she clearly is very passionate about the work- this came through in her conducting- but this was not enough to carry the concert.  I am sorry to say that I did not join in the applause and cannot agree that it was &quot;thoroughly well-deserved.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a rather forgiving review.  I was unable to attend the first half, but the Brahms was mediocre at best.  Although there was some very fine singing from choir and soloists, Beekman&#8217;s conducting effectively ruined the work.  Tempi were odd and poorly informed, the program notes were badly written, long-winded, frequently simply untrue, and demonstrated a poor understanding of the work.  Many of the cutoffs simply didn&#8217;t happen, leaving the choir to scatter helplessly at cadences.  I appreciate that she clearly is very passionate about the work- this came through in her conducting- but this was not enough to carry the concert.  I am sorry to say that I did not join in the applause and cannot agree that it was &#8220;thoroughly well-deserved.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
