<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Future of Classical Music Broadcasting in Boston in Jeopardy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/</link>
	<description>a virtual journal and blog of the classical music scene in Boston</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:51:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry</title>
		<link>http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/comment-page-2/#comment-6617</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 16:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classical-scene.com/?p=2320#comment-6617</guid>
		<description>I guess the ideal of reading this site as a respite from vitriol such as the previous comment was all too much to hope for...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the ideal of reading this site as a respite from vitriol such as the previous comment was all too much to hope for&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Redshield</title>
		<link>http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/comment-page-2/#comment-6614</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Redshield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 04:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classical-scene.com/?p=2320#comment-6614</guid>
		<description>I heard about this meeting after the fact; turns out I had another meeting at the time.

  I was a listener of WCRB from ca. 1964 until recently.  At age 12 I discovered &quot;Classical&quot; and fortunately in 1964 there were a half dozen Classical outlets on Radio.  One at 107.something (WBZ-FM?); 104.1 for the flagship station of the Boston Concert Network, WBCN.  102.5 for WCRB; 96.something for WXHR(?) that carried DeKoven--they became WJIB; 95.3 for WHRB; 90.9 for WBUR; 89.7 for WGBH.  On AM there was even WCRB at 1330 and WXHR at 740.
   Then the Rock tripe hit.  The classical stations dropped like flies to be replaced by cookie-cutter sound alike Rock drivel--a pile driver &amp; air compressor combo would be more entertaining and might do useful work instead of John Lennon, Bob Dylan, Grateful Dead, Jefferson Airplane, etc.
   Bloated salaries at &#039;GBH might be the real problem.  Plus having an agenda..are the 89.7 nightly jazz broadcasts a piece of Affirmative Action?  Is Friday Symphony too many Dead White Males?
   
   OK.  The posts are useful, though there is too much left-wing drivel out there.  Corporations are Evil while non-profits are good.  Hogwarsh!  WGBH/WCRB is an institutional problem and this dumbing-down of Classical is a direct result of the New Left Drivel of the 1960&#039;s and &#039;70&#039;s.  Marx to Lenin to Stalin to Mao to Pol Pot to Obama is the progression of Academia.
   Wonder what has become of Richard Knisely&#039;s &quot;projects&quot;?  I will look into that American Public Media outfit: one needs to know what Satan looks like!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard about this meeting after the fact; turns out I had another meeting at the time.</p>
<p>  I was a listener of WCRB from ca. 1964 until recently.  At age 12 I discovered &#8220;Classical&#8221; and fortunately in 1964 there were a half dozen Classical outlets on Radio.  One at 107.something (WBZ-FM?); 104.1 for the flagship station of the Boston Concert Network, WBCN.  102.5 for WCRB; 96.something for WXHR(?) that carried DeKoven&#8211;they became WJIB; 95.3 for WHRB; 90.9 for WBUR; 89.7 for WGBH.  On AM there was even WCRB at 1330 and WXHR at 740.<br />
   Then the Rock tripe hit.  The classical stations dropped like flies to be replaced by cookie-cutter sound alike Rock drivel&#8211;a pile driver &amp; air compressor combo would be more entertaining and might do useful work instead of John Lennon, Bob Dylan, Grateful Dead, Jefferson Airplane, etc.<br />
   Bloated salaries at &#8216;GBH might be the real problem.  Plus having an agenda..are the 89.7 nightly jazz broadcasts a piece of Affirmative Action?  Is Friday Symphony too many Dead White Males?</p>
<p>   OK.  The posts are useful, though there is too much left-wing drivel out there.  Corporations are Evil while non-profits are good.  Hogwarsh!  WGBH/WCRB is an institutional problem and this dumbing-down of Classical is a direct result of the New Left Drivel of the 1960&#8242;s and &#8217;70&#8242;s.  Marx to Lenin to Stalin to Mao to Pol Pot to Obama is the progression of Academia.<br />
   Wonder what has become of Richard Knisely&#8217;s &#8220;projects&#8221;?  I will look into that American Public Media outfit: one needs to know what Satan looks like!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Knisely</title>
		<link>http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/comment-page-2/#comment-2351</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Knisely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 23:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classical-scene.com/?p=2320#comment-2351</guid>
		<description>Is anyone reading this stream anymore?

In response to Edward Wagner (above) and others I would like to announce that I am developing a website that will do the same thing I did for 25 years at WGBH, only more focused on the music community of the Boston area.  A wide variety of performances by local individuals and ensembles updated regularly, covering all periods without qualms about the contemporary!) in daily hosted segments, along with features and specials introducing the various music makers, artists and composers, venues, festivals, etc.

I am currently building the site and trying to drum up some backers for it.

info or comments welcome!  -richardknisely2@earthlink.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is anyone reading this stream anymore?</p>
<p>In response to Edward Wagner (above) and others I would like to announce that I am developing a website that will do the same thing I did for 25 years at WGBH, only more focused on the music community of the Boston area.  A wide variety of performances by local individuals and ensembles updated regularly, covering all periods without qualms about the contemporary!) in daily hosted segments, along with features and specials introducing the various music makers, artists and composers, venues, festivals, etc.</p>
<p>I am currently building the site and trying to drum up some backers for it.</p>
<p>info or comments welcome!  <a href="mailto:-richardknisely2@earthlink.net">-richardknisely2@earthlink.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Wagner</title>
		<link>http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/comment-page-2/#comment-2137</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classical-scene.com/?p=2320#comment-2137</guid>
		<description>So now it has been four months since that meeting at the beginning of 2010. What has happened since?

Truly, the longer I have thought about it the more I am convinced that certain institutions in Boston have made the musical community perhaps lazy and prone to take for granted that their art would always be made accessible and available to the public by the broadcasting power of WGBH or the prestige of the BSO or the conservatories. This community needs to take its fate into its own hands. The INSTITUTION of WGBH is DEAD. Everyone in the musical community from Joel Cohen to Gunther Schuller to younger musicians need to ask themselves what they would like to see in an ideal classical music, not station but disseminator, and only THEN think about the technology. Surely if all the money (from individuals or institutions)that is given to the &#039;GBH empire for the sake of MUSIC and take for grated by them were to directed to clean new project, well, Mr. Cohen, let your imagination run wild.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So now it has been four months since that meeting at the beginning of 2010. What has happened since?</p>
<p>Truly, the longer I have thought about it the more I am convinced that certain institutions in Boston have made the musical community perhaps lazy and prone to take for granted that their art would always be made accessible and available to the public by the broadcasting power of WGBH or the prestige of the BSO or the conservatories. This community needs to take its fate into its own hands. The INSTITUTION of WGBH is DEAD. Everyone in the musical community from Joel Cohen to Gunther Schuller to younger musicians need to ask themselves what they would like to see in an ideal classical music, not station but disseminator, and only THEN think about the technology. Surely if all the money (from individuals or institutions)that is given to the &#8216;GBH empire for the sake of MUSIC and take for grated by them were to directed to clean new project, well, Mr. Cohen, let your imagination run wild.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/comment-page-2/#comment-2132</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classical-scene.com/?p=2320#comment-2132</guid>
		<description>Would you please also do a story on KDFC 102.1 FM (www.kdfc.com) out of San Francisco, CA, and also KQAC 89.9 FM (Allclassical.org with out the 995 in front of it) out of Portland, Oregon? Both stations are doing innovative programming and are bringing the WOW FACTOR to Classical Music. That was what I hoped would have been the result of WGBH taking over WCRB.
 I used to be an intern at the old WCRB, and was deeply saddened when the decline started with Nassau Broadcasting, running the station into the ground. Let&#039;s not forget that Greater Media bought the station to steal its 102.5 FM Frequency.
 If WGBH does buy another frequency, I hope that it&#039;s Country 102.5 FM, and WCRB is allowed to return to it&#039;s original home on the dial.I also found out that some of the great recordings that WCRB used to have were sent to WHRB. A prime example is an RCA Victor Recording of Castel-Nuovo Tedesco&#039;s Guitar Concerto # 1, which I had requested be played on WCRB, when owned by Nassau, and I was told that it was not a reasonable request, since they no longer had the recording. However, I requested it on WHRB, and that is how I found out that &#039; HRB may have some of &#039; CRB&#039;s recordings, as they had the recording.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you please also do a story on KDFC 102.1 FM (www.kdfc.com) out of San Francisco, CA, and also KQAC 89.9 FM (Allclassical.org with out the 995 in front of it) out of Portland, Oregon? Both stations are doing innovative programming and are bringing the WOW FACTOR to Classical Music. That was what I hoped would have been the result of WGBH taking over WCRB.<br />
 I used to be an intern at the old WCRB, and was deeply saddened when the decline started with Nassau Broadcasting, running the station into the ground. Let&#8217;s not forget that Greater Media bought the station to steal its 102.5 FM Frequency.<br />
 If WGBH does buy another frequency, I hope that it&#8217;s Country 102.5 FM, and WCRB is allowed to return to it&#8217;s original home on the dial.I also found out that some of the great recordings that WCRB used to have were sent to WHRB. A prime example is an RCA Victor Recording of Castel-Nuovo Tedesco&#8217;s Guitar Concerto # 1, which I had requested be played on WCRB, when owned by Nassau, and I was told that it was not a reasonable request, since they no longer had the recording. However, I requested it on WHRB, and that is how I found out that &#8216; HRB may have some of &#8216; CRB&#8217;s recordings, as they had the recording.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alannala</title>
		<link>http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/comment-page-2/#comment-2022</link>
		<dc:creator>alannala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 08:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classical-scene.com/?p=2320#comment-2022</guid>
		<description>i live in provincetown, mass., the very end of cape cod for those of you who don&#039;t know... and i get a clear signal on WCRB, even though technically i&#039;m out of range of the broadcast.  The fact of having cape cod bay between my radio and the tower makes propagation over salt water and unobstructed paths the key.  Anyway, just wanted to say that listeners can greatly improve reception by knowing how to set up a dipole antenna, like the one that came with my radio. try different locations in your house, too. Small adjustments can be significant.
   As for public radio:  it sucks.  It has become so commercialized and ratings oriented that i can&#039;t listen anymore. there are programs that are good of course, but the incessant whining for money and the incessant sponsor ads and the incessant &quot;listeners like you&quot; bullshit is so torturing that i have gone to the internet, for good.  bye bye broadcasting.  the internet is the only place that will spawn the mission values that once made public broadcasting a treasure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i live in provincetown, mass., the very end of cape cod for those of you who don&#8217;t know&#8230; and i get a clear signal on WCRB, even though technically i&#8217;m out of range of the broadcast.  The fact of having cape cod bay between my radio and the tower makes propagation over salt water and unobstructed paths the key.  Anyway, just wanted to say that listeners can greatly improve reception by knowing how to set up a dipole antenna, like the one that came with my radio. try different locations in your house, too. Small adjustments can be significant.<br />
   As for public radio:  it sucks.  It has become so commercialized and ratings oriented that i can&#8217;t listen anymore. there are programs that are good of course, but the incessant whining for money and the incessant sponsor ads and the incessant &#8220;listeners like you&#8221; bullshit is so torturing that i have gone to the internet, for good.  bye bye broadcasting.  the internet is the only place that will spawn the mission values that once made public broadcasting a treasure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PODCAST: William Bulger, Chris Lydon, WGBH, WCRB, and the Future of Classical Music on the Radio - Phlog</title>
		<link>http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/comment-page-2/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator>PODCAST: William Bulger, Chris Lydon, WGBH, WCRB, and the Future of Classical Music on the Radio - Phlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classical-scene.com/?p=2320#comment-1361</guid>
		<description>[...] South Church on January 5 was eerily familiar -- an older audience, larger than you&#039;d expect (the organizers put it at 400-plus), venting its collective spleen at hapless [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] South Church on January 5 was eerily familiar &#8212; an older audience, larger than you&#39;d expect (the organizers put it at 400-plus), venting its collective spleen at hapless [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Bouchard</title>
		<link>http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/comment-page-2/#comment-1355</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Bouchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classical-scene.com/?p=2320#comment-1355</guid>
		<description>As regards WHRB, aside from the herculean student energies that send forth their orgies, even the daily classical programming is relatively diverse, inclusive (and more consistently provocative than the jazz). And its signal serves me better in Belmont than the eWCRB&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As regards WHRB, aside from the herculean student energies that send forth their orgies, even the daily classical programming is relatively diverse, inclusive (and more consistently provocative than the jazz). And its signal serves me better in Belmont than the eWCRB&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vance Koven</title>
		<link>http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/comment-page-2/#comment-1354</link>
		<dc:creator>Vance Koven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classical-scene.com/?p=2320#comment-1354</guid>
		<description>To Robert Meyers: My understanding is that WHRB does not keep archives of its Orgy® programs; they just play &#039;em, they don&#039;t rerecord the recordings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Robert Meyers: My understanding is that WHRB does not keep archives of its Orgy® programs; they just play &#8216;em, they don&#8217;t rerecord the recordings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Meyers</title>
		<link>http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/comment-page-2/#comment-1346</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Meyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classical-scene.com/?p=2320#comment-1346</guid>
		<description>The large gathering last week was heartening for the size of its turnout, as well as for some trenchant remarks by Chris Lydon and Joel Cohen. It remaibns to be seen whether our disappointment with the policies of GBH can be shaped into enough pressure to elicit significant change. 

I would like to suggest that the &quot;Orgy&quot; archives at WHRB might be made available somehow -- they were and continue to be truly splendid examples of classical music broadcasting. Thanks Dave Elliot.

Thanks to Lee Eisman for his dedicated work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The large gathering last week was heartening for the size of its turnout, as well as for some trenchant remarks by Chris Lydon and Joel Cohen. It remaibns to be seen whether our disappointment with the policies of GBH can be shaped into enough pressure to elicit significant change. </p>
<p>I would like to suggest that the &#8220;Orgy&#8221; archives at WHRB might be made available somehow &#8212; they were and continue to be truly splendid examples of classical music broadcasting. Thanks Dave Elliot.</p>
<p>Thanks to Lee Eisman for his dedicated work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Eiseman</title>
		<link>http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/comment-page-2/#comment-1345</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Eiseman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classical-scene.com/?p=2320#comment-1345</guid>
		<description>BMInt is working on a story about two public radio stations, KUSC and WETA. They both morphed from variety format to all-talk and lost audience share. Subsequently both switched to all-classical and substantially improved market shares. This could be a cautionary tale for WGBH.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BMInt is working on a story about two public radio stations, KUSC and WETA. They both morphed from variety format to all-talk and lost audience share. Subsequently both switched to all-classical and substantially improved market shares. This could be a cautionary tale for WGBH.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre Paquin</title>
		<link>http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/comment-page-2/#comment-1344</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre Paquin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classical-scene.com/?p=2320#comment-1344</guid>
		<description>Changes were made due to Boston Radio marketing
WGBH: in 2008: 1.08%
WBUR:in 2008: 3.8%
WCRB:in 2008: 1.8%

The results after the switching WGBH/WCRB for December 2009. WBZ AM 5.6 – (for reference)
WGBH: 0.9 -
WBUR: 4.5 +
WCRB: 2.9 +

When I was broadcasting on Cape Cod WFCC full time classical(1989-1995)my weekend ratings for the Cape Cod Market were between 5 and 8.1. Why? I did not program classical music to myself, had a full knowledge of discography both historical up to current recordings, refused to be snooty(WGBH AM was “If it ain’t French it’s piano!), did not take minutes to beging speaking(Lurtsema), did not suffer from “one-lung” delivery,(WGBH 12 to 4 PM) put chamber music programming secondary, orchestral music primary. Finally, “One does not air music played by the Iceland Symphony when you can choose the same played by Munch and the BSO, for example…
It is simple to build and keep an audience when you know what to do ansd what to say and how to say it. Where I or any of my WFCC associates at WGBH instead of WFCC today, ratings would be much higher and WGBH would be full-time classical music with rating oh so much higher than 0.9%!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Changes were made due to Boston Radio marketing<br />
WGBH: in 2008: 1.08%<br />
WBUR:in 2008: 3.8%<br />
WCRB:in 2008: 1.8%</p>
<p>The results after the switching WGBH/WCRB for December 2009. WBZ AM 5.6 – (for reference)<br />
WGBH: 0.9 -<br />
WBUR: 4.5 +<br />
WCRB: 2.9 +</p>
<p>When I was broadcasting on Cape Cod WFCC full time classical(1989-1995)my weekend ratings for the Cape Cod Market were between 5 and 8.1. Why? I did not program classical music to myself, had a full knowledge of discography both historical up to current recordings, refused to be snooty(WGBH AM was “If it ain’t French it’s piano!), did not take minutes to beging speaking(Lurtsema), did not suffer from “one-lung” delivery,(WGBH 12 to 4 PM) put chamber music programming secondary, orchestral music primary. Finally, “One does not air music played by the Iceland Symphony when you can choose the same played by Munch and the BSO, for example…<br />
It is simple to build and keep an audience when you know what to do ansd what to say and how to say it. Where I or any of my WFCC associates at WGBH instead of WFCC today, ratings would be much higher and WGBH would be full-time classical music with rating oh so much higher than 0.9%!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Whipple</title>
		<link>http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/comment-page-1/#comment-1331</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Whipple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 03:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classical-scene.com/?p=2320#comment-1331</guid>
		<description>Romy — The call letters for 99.5 are still WCRB. They say them once in a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Romy — The call letters for 99.5 are still WCRB. They say them once in a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romy The Cat</title>
		<link>http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/comment-page-1/#comment-1330</link>
		<dc:creator>Romy The Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 01:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classical-scene.com/?p=2320#comment-1330</guid>
		<description>I wonder is anything might grow out all of this besides just a few frustrating posts at the numerous internet sites? The WGBH administration does not give a damn about nether your frustration nor your interests. Mr. Voci was openly annoyed during the meeting but I do not blame him: he is an accidental person in classical music broadcasting. My point: is anything &lt;i&gt;actionable &lt;/i&gt; might be done with WGBH in order do not let the senseless bureaucrats to suffocate one of the few remaining windows of live classical music from MF?

I run a consulting company and last few month I’ve been dealing with a large local financial institution. During the last fall if was surreal in their office – each Friday a bunch of people turned listening BSO live broadcasts. It was almost funny - how people creatively planed meetings, how they put the headphones on, how they closed doors in their offices at 1.30PM. During the broadcast intermission we:  the accountants, consultants, directors, lawyers, legal assistants, data administrators, project managers, compliance officers, auditors… etc… met at coffee machine and discussed BSO play. It was a unique window in another world, the world where there is something alive and more existing then in our boring corporate institution…. This week it was like a death of a family member… People asked me “Where is your BSO?” What can I say? I told them that some anonymous WGBH corporate freak decided to shine his/her intelligence and vandalized our live BSO broadcasts.  It is truly same! Some people talk about demise of FM as media but if the demise is man-made then it is not demise but murder.  I ask again: is anything &lt;i&gt;practical&lt;/i&gt; might be done to stop the people who destroy WGBH?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder is anything might grow out all of this besides just a few frustrating posts at the numerous internet sites? The WGBH administration does not give a damn about nether your frustration nor your interests. Mr. Voci was openly annoyed during the meeting but I do not blame him: he is an accidental person in classical music broadcasting. My point: is anything <i>actionable </i> might be done with WGBH in order do not let the senseless bureaucrats to suffocate one of the few remaining windows of live classical music from MF?</p>
<p>I run a consulting company and last few month I’ve been dealing with a large local financial institution. During the last fall if was surreal in their office – each Friday a bunch of people turned listening BSO live broadcasts. It was almost funny &#8211; how people creatively planed meetings, how they put the headphones on, how they closed doors in their offices at 1.30PM. During the broadcast intermission we:  the accountants, consultants, directors, lawyers, legal assistants, data administrators, project managers, compliance officers, auditors… etc… met at coffee machine and discussed BSO play. It was a unique window in another world, the world where there is something alive and more existing then in our boring corporate institution…. This week it was like a death of a family member… People asked me “Where is your BSO?” What can I say? I told them that some anonymous WGBH corporate freak decided to shine his/her intelligence and vandalized our live BSO broadcasts.  It is truly same! Some people talk about demise of FM as media but if the demise is man-made then it is not demise but murder.  I ask again: is anything <i>practical</i> might be done to stop the people who destroy WGBH?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim784</title>
		<link>http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/comment-page-1/#comment-1329</link>
		<dc:creator>jim784</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classical-scene.com/?p=2320#comment-1329</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a little disingenuous of WGBH to say that classical music gets low ratings when they are doing everything in their power to ensure the ratings stay low.  Since Robert J. there has been no attempt to cultivate and promote on air personalities or to allow them to develop individual styles in programming and presentation.  As Joel Cohen points out there are so many different types of classical music programming that could be developed other than simply spinning a disc.

When I came to Boston as a college freshman in 1969 I came from a small town and a family where there was no classical music.  I had some interest, but I really knew nothing about it and had heard very little.  It was radio that allowed me to develop my interest.  I listened to those BSO and Pops broadcasts.  Knowing that the performances were taking place just down the street made the performances more interesting to me than if they had been on records or some orchestra someplace else in the world.  Because of these broadcasts I eventually started going to concerts.  There were many Friday mornings and Saturday afternoons spent standing in the rush ticket line.

Back then WCRB published a program guide each month, similar to what WHRB now puts out, listing all the music they would be playing.  I would go through it line by line and highlight the music I wanted to hear.  There is so much music that I first heard on the radio.  So many recordings I&#039;ve bought and concerts I&#039;ve gone to because of the radio.  This is what is being lost and it is a shame.

I was just looking at the blurb for WCRB at classicalwebcast.com.  It is really a revolting paean to banality and as far as I can tell perfectly in line with the intentions of WGBH:
&quot;You don&#039;t need to know anything about our music to enjoy WCRB, the music is fresh but familiar, relaxing yet invigorating.Our program hosts are warm, friendly people, not the stodgy academics you may have heard on other stations.&quot;
Remember that WGBH tv discontinued BSO broadcasts and now gives us endless repeats of Andre Rieu.  Why should we expect them to do any differently on the radio?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a little disingenuous of WGBH to say that classical music gets low ratings when they are doing everything in their power to ensure the ratings stay low.  Since Robert J. there has been no attempt to cultivate and promote on air personalities or to allow them to develop individual styles in programming and presentation.  As Joel Cohen points out there are so many different types of classical music programming that could be developed other than simply spinning a disc.</p>
<p>When I came to Boston as a college freshman in 1969 I came from a small town and a family where there was no classical music.  I had some interest, but I really knew nothing about it and had heard very little.  It was radio that allowed me to develop my interest.  I listened to those BSO and Pops broadcasts.  Knowing that the performances were taking place just down the street made the performances more interesting to me than if they had been on records or some orchestra someplace else in the world.  Because of these broadcasts I eventually started going to concerts.  There were many Friday mornings and Saturday afternoons spent standing in the rush ticket line.</p>
<p>Back then WCRB published a program guide each month, similar to what WHRB now puts out, listing all the music they would be playing.  I would go through it line by line and highlight the music I wanted to hear.  There is so much music that I first heard on the radio.  So many recordings I&#8217;ve bought and concerts I&#8217;ve gone to because of the radio.  This is what is being lost and it is a shame.</p>
<p>I was just looking at the blurb for WCRB at classicalwebcast.com.  It is really a revolting paean to banality and as far as I can tell perfectly in line with the intentions of WGBH:<br />
&#8220;You don&#8217;t need to know anything about our music to enjoy WCRB, the music is fresh but familiar, relaxing yet invigorating.Our program hosts are warm, friendly people, not the stodgy academics you may have heard on other stations.&#8221;<br />
Remember that WGBH tv discontinued BSO broadcasts and now gives us endless repeats of Andre Rieu.  Why should we expect them to do any differently on the radio?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EYF</title>
		<link>http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/comment-page-1/#comment-1328</link>
		<dc:creator>EYF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classical-scene.com/?p=2320#comment-1328</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m lucky enough to live where I can receive WHRB, but am so frustrated by the low level of programming and dumbed-down twaddle on WGBH that I&#039;ve given up....now it&#039;s BBC3 live and BBC3 iplayer (broadcasts available online for 7 days after first airing) by computer. There&#039;s great supporting information on their website, and the radio commentary is literate and informative. Even MET Opera broadcasts are accessible in real time and (for now) on the 7 day replay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m lucky enough to live where I can receive WHRB, but am so frustrated by the low level of programming and dumbed-down twaddle on WGBH that I&#8217;ve given up&#8230;.now it&#8217;s BBC3 live and BBC3 iplayer (broadcasts available online for 7 days after first airing) by computer. There&#8217;s great supporting information on their website, and the radio commentary is literate and informative. Even MET Opera broadcasts are accessible in real time and (for now) on the 7 day replay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Stephens</title>
		<link>http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/comment-page-1/#comment-1327</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Stephens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classical-scene.com/?p=2320#comment-1327</guid>
		<description>Upset in Ashland - I, too, am considering cancelling my &quot;sustainer&quot; membership, being unable to receive WCRB (home, office, or commute) and finding 89.7 almost painful to listen to at times.  All it would take at this point is for 89.7 &quot;talk radio&quot; to start taking on-air listener calls to appeal to the red neck demographic.

On a semi-positive note, Joel Cohen (01/09/10 suggests some very exciting classical programming options.  Perhaps WGBH should consider hiring him to bail them out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upset in Ashland &#8211; I, too, am considering cancelling my &#8220;sustainer&#8221; membership, being unable to receive WCRB (home, office, or commute) and finding 89.7 almost painful to listen to at times.  All it would take at this point is for 89.7 &#8220;talk radio&#8221; to start taking on-air listener calls to appeal to the red neck demographic.</p>
<p>On a semi-positive note, Joel Cohen (01/09/10 suggests some very exciting classical programming options.  Perhaps WGBH should consider hiring him to bail them out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romy</title>
		<link>http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/comment-page-1/#comment-1326</link>
		<dc:creator>Romy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classical-scene.com/?p=2320#comment-1326</guid>
		<description>I do not think that it would be any problem to cancel a membership. 

What interest me is if there is any chance to provide conditional donations. The bylaws article for non-profits usually allows receiving assets in a format of free donations and also in a format of donor-imposed conditions. I am not sure how WGBH operate – I presume as they are non-profit. Still, they ran commercials and do many other things that I do not feel comfortable with. So, would it be possible to donate money to WGBH and to make sure that it would go ONLY for inreaching classical programming but not for organization of NPR’s banquets or paying off the liquidation consultants after the GBH will screw the thing to the ground? Are any lawyers out there who can clear this thing up?

Also, for God sake, can somebody advise those “professionals” to get own call sign. We have two WGBH on a dialer – it is ridicules. The “99.5 all-classical” is not a standard FM name!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think that it would be any problem to cancel a membership. </p>
<p>What interest me is if there is any chance to provide conditional donations. The bylaws article for non-profits usually allows receiving assets in a format of free donations and also in a format of donor-imposed conditions. I am not sure how WGBH operate – I presume as they are non-profit. Still, they ran commercials and do many other things that I do not feel comfortable with. So, would it be possible to donate money to WGBH and to make sure that it would go ONLY for inreaching classical programming but not for organization of NPR’s banquets or paying off the liquidation consultants after the GBH will screw the thing to the ground? Are any lawyers out there who can clear this thing up?</p>
<p>Also, for God sake, can somebody advise those “professionals” to get own call sign. We have two WGBH on a dialer – it is ridicules. The “99.5 all-classical” is not a standard FM name!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikhaela Houston</title>
		<link>http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/comment-page-1/#comment-1324</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikhaela Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classical-scene.com/?p=2320#comment-1324</guid>
		<description>Upset in Ashland - I would either call or, better yet, write a letter stating you want to cancel the membership AND WHY.  That way, it will be in writing and you can leave a paper trail.  Also, look at the fine print, if there is any, on the membership materials.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upset in Ashland &#8211; I would either call or, better yet, write a letter stating you want to cancel the membership AND WHY.  That way, it will be in writing and you can leave a paper trail.  Also, look at the fine print, if there is any, on the membership materials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Upset in Ashland</title>
		<link>http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/comment-page-1/#comment-1319</link>
		<dc:creator>Upset in Ashland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classical-scene.com/?p=2320#comment-1319</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know how to cancel a &quot;sustaining&quot; membership to WGBH.  Is there a way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know how to cancel a &#8220;sustaining&#8221; membership to WGBH.  Is there a way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romy The CaT</title>
		<link>http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/comment-page-1/#comment-1317</link>
		<dc:creator>Romy The CaT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 03:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classical-scene.com/?p=2320#comment-1317</guid>
		<description>Great! The 99.5FM that according to Mr. Voci was the “classical music saver in Boston” just broadcasted BSO live with confused stereo channels: the BSO’s first violins on right – very creative! The center image of the orchestra sonically defeated and moved God know where. The whole wooding section is like not even exist. Do I need to take yoga classes and to learn how to listen radio sitting upside down or Yo-Yo Ma did play hios Haydn concerto from the last chair of the second violins? Mind you that all of this barbarism is taking place with absolutely perfect modulations from both R and L 99.5 channels, and with perfect in-phase arival. I do not know what Mr. Voci is willing to “save” with such creative orchestra mixing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great! The 99.5FM that according to Mr. Voci was the “classical music saver in Boston” just broadcasted BSO live with confused stereo channels: the BSO’s first violins on right – very creative! The center image of the orchestra sonically defeated and moved God know where. The whole wooding section is like not even exist. Do I need to take yoga classes and to learn how to listen radio sitting upside down or Yo-Yo Ma did play hios Haydn concerto from the last chair of the second violins? Mind you that all of this barbarism is taking place with absolutely perfect modulations from both R and L 99.5 channels, and with perfect in-phase arival. I do not know what Mr. Voci is willing to “save” with such creative orchestra mixing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Curtis</title>
		<link>http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/comment-page-1/#comment-1316</link>
		<dc:creator>David Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 03:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classical-scene.com/?p=2320#comment-1316</guid>
		<description>Re:rick and William Pierce. I&#039;d like to know what Ron Della Chiesa thinks !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re:rick and William Pierce. I&#8217;d like to know what Ron Della Chiesa thinks !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/comment-page-1/#comment-1315</link>
		<dc:creator>rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 00:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classical-scene.com/?p=2320#comment-1315</guid>
		<description>What do you think William Pierce ( former voice of the Boston Symphony concerts ) would have to say about all this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think William Pierce ( former voice of the Boston Symphony concerts ) would have to say about all this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Cohen</title>
		<link>http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/comment-page-1/#comment-1312</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 14:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classical-scene.com/?p=2320#comment-1312</guid>
		<description>&quot;Cut the canned music!&quot;

Regarding the canned music issue, I raised this point after last week&#039;s meeting with a senior member of the music production staff.  He said that there was simply inadequate funding to generate individualized,  locally-produced programming 24/7, thus the move towards cheaper, turn-on-the-faucet syndication.

There is plenty of depth here in Boston on the classical deejay bench.  What is lacking at the station is the will to allocate necessary resources -- surely quite modest by TV or big-sports standards -- to consistently good cultural programming. Once again,  the question of the WGBH/Lowell Foundation&#039;s  mission comes to the fore. Is that mission being honored today?

Of course, the function of a publicly funded music station in a world-class city is much, much more than spinning platters,  as that used to be called back in the day of Guillaume de Machaut. The other,  mainly-missing-right-now 80% -- live performances,  master classes,  music history series, programs and mini-series on special topics,  non-Western classical music, jazz and folk (yes,  I believe these belong), pre-concert and intermission features,  current CD reviews, blindfold comparisons, feeds from American and European festivals, a composers&#039; forum, a daily what&#039;s-going-on onair journal, a young performers&#039; showcase minus the comedy routines, etc etc etc -- also needs to be evisioned, and given room to run. We here in Boston are settling for much,  much less than the best.  Our public media needs to represent who we are. That is what they are there for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Cut the canned music!&#8221;</p>
<p>Regarding the canned music issue, I raised this point after last week&#8217;s meeting with a senior member of the music production staff.  He said that there was simply inadequate funding to generate individualized,  locally-produced programming 24/7, thus the move towards cheaper, turn-on-the-faucet syndication.</p>
<p>There is plenty of depth here in Boston on the classical deejay bench.  What is lacking at the station is the will to allocate necessary resources &#8212; surely quite modest by TV or big-sports standards &#8212; to consistently good cultural programming. Once again,  the question of the WGBH/Lowell Foundation&#8217;s  mission comes to the fore. Is that mission being honored today?</p>
<p>Of course, the function of a publicly funded music station in a world-class city is much, much more than spinning platters,  as that used to be called back in the day of Guillaume de Machaut. The other,  mainly-missing-right-now 80% &#8212; live performances,  master classes,  music history series, programs and mini-series on special topics,  non-Western classical music, jazz and folk (yes,  I believe these belong), pre-concert and intermission features,  current CD reviews, blindfold comparisons, feeds from American and European festivals, a composers&#8217; forum, a daily what&#8217;s-going-on onair journal, a young performers&#8217; showcase minus the comedy routines, etc etc etc &#8212; also needs to be evisioned, and given room to run. We here in Boston are settling for much,  much less than the best.  Our public media needs to represent who we are. That is what they are there for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Genola</title>
		<link>http://classical-scene.com/2010/01/06/wgbh-wcrb-panel-discussion-great-success/comment-page-1/#comment-1311</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Genola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 02:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classical-scene.com/?p=2320#comment-1311</guid>
		<description>So WCRB is mostly just playing canned music? Taped music disguised as a live deejay? Did any Boston deejays loose their job when they started playing taped music from Minnesota? 

A quality community radio station would play music handpicked by local experts from that community. Someone familiar with the tastes of local listeners should be playing the music. How can a taped program from Minnesota understand what works in the Boston arts groups and venues?

We don&#039;t need WCRB to hear that taped Minnesota show, that is already syndicated on other stations and can be streamed over the internet via computer at home or iPhone in your car. Why donate to WCRB for taped music that is already easily available to us elsewhere? WCRB needs to be providing the community something unique. Cut the canned music!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So WCRB is mostly just playing canned music? Taped music disguised as a live deejay? Did any Boston deejays loose their job when they started playing taped music from Minnesota? </p>
<p>A quality community radio station would play music handpicked by local experts from that community. Someone familiar with the tastes of local listeners should be playing the music. How can a taped program from Minnesota understand what works in the Boston arts groups and venues?</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t need WCRB to hear that taped Minnesota show, that is already syndicated on other stations and can be streamed over the internet via computer at home or iPhone in your car. Why donate to WCRB for taped music that is already easily available to us elsewhere? WCRB needs to be providing the community something unique. Cut the canned music!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

