IN: Reviews

Heroic Thunder with the BSO

by

The Boston Symphony Orchestra showed off expert chops in a triumphant night of heroic proportions, featuring Mozart’s Jupiter Symphony and Strauss’s Ein Heldenleben. This pair of audience favorites invited comparisons and considerations that brought out the strengths of each piece. The Jupiter Symphony represents the summit of Mozart’s symphonic path; Ein Heldenleben, Strauss’s uberdrama, reckons with his own brand of heroism. Both composers stretched the forms — Classical symphony or ultra-Romantic tone poem — to their limits. Mozart stuffed his symphony full of contrapuntal invention, and Heldenleben’s 45 minutes and massive orchestra made it the longest, largest tone poem yet. Yet each piece’s individual qualities stood out in juxtaposition with each other: the clarity and grace of Mozart’s symphony and Strauss’s effusively emotional style. The BSO realized both personalities masterfully.

Thunderous chords opened the Jupiter, trading off with gentle sighs. The BSO dashed off in a surprisingly fast tempo, which enhanced the elegant character without seeming rushed. Over time, it either slowed off ― or my ears just became accustomed. In the first movement, sweet strains contrasted heavily with turbulent exclamations. The Andante cantabile provided another beginning of contrasts: an inviting hand, then a forte punctuation, firm yet not harsh. Rounded attacks and smooth melodies created a cozy, blooming warmth, as gentle reassurances in this singing movement suffused the colors of anxiety.

The easygoing minuet and trio carried on the genial atmosphere. Smiles abounded amongst rivers of legato and fortes more like bursts of good cheer than hammer strikes. Then, again, the orchestra set off at breakneck pace in the Molto allegro finale. The BSO’s clear, bright playing allowed this contrapuntal tour de force to shine, with eighth notes right in lockstep in all sections. Sforzandos and accents resonated with weight without being inappropriately heavy. The legendary quintuple fugue climax, with five different motives all dancing about, worked its wonders before the ensemble blasted off to a fanfaring finish.

Throughout the Mozart, Andris Nelsons directed with deep craft and gentle care. He found a great deal of opportunity for expressive phrasing, shaped by subtle, nuanced gestures in both hands. A couple tasteful bends in time, such as grand pauses stretched by just a moment, or some little slows into large arrivals, added fun to the mix. Crisp brass and timpani provided pomp and flair, woodwind colors rang out clearly and neatly, and the strings consistently impressed in speedy runs and lilting tunes. Through all this, Mozart’s classic operatic character became evident in quick character changes and large dynamic ranges. Always brimming with joie de vivre, the Jupiter Symphony orbited with great joy.

Following the intermission, the musicians embarked on Strauss’s Ein Heldenleben. The cellos, basses, and horns declaimed the famous opening theme to depict The Hero, bombastic and courageous in its wide range. Around these bold assertions, a vast, expansive landscape arose from the orchestra, marked by bright brass calls. These passionate leaps and long-reaching melodies were suddenly interrupted by a coterie of twittering, cackling winds, picking and pecking at the hero. Along with ominous low brass fifths and triads, these represented The Hero’s Adversaries. Here the voice of the hero lost its confidence, falling to uncertain sorrows. The critics’ voices and the hero’s laments combined and grew and grew, raging, until…

…the solo violin spun onto the scene, coquettish, teasing. Concertmaster Nathan Cole embodied The Hero’s Companion with wonderfully endearing flair, playfully disarming and charming. This lover skipped about with amorous sugar and virtuosic spice, trading barbs with aggressive brass and low strings, craving and chasing. These exchanges between the hero’s desire and the single violin continued, reaching intense heights, until the full orchestral love scene exploded in lush, sensuous scoring. This tenderly unfurling affection drifted off into quiet night.

But the adversarial windbags returned, whispering in the wind, and an offstage trumpet fanfare called us back to action, with The Hero at Battle. Military percussion and huge brass calls heralded this war scene. A whirling mosaic of chaotic voices and melodies filled the hall, in typical Straussian fashion, overwhelming our brains and ears with all sorts of musical events and surprises. This sonic combat ended in an E-flat triumph, bringing back the hero’s theme in all strings in a satisfying, welcome return. Here, The Hero’s Works of Peace displayed themselves pridefully. Individual winds’ voices called out within a series of quotes of Strauss’s earlier tone poems. The E-flat clarinet & bass clarinet quote of Till Eulenspiegel especially poked out, thumbing its nose. Seas of sound in waves of memory and accomplishment ebbed and flowed, but suddenly another clash ensued, frenetic and unpredictable.

But this time, instead of gallant vanquishment, the hero retreated to love and domesticity. As Strauss suggested, here was The Hero’s Retirement from this World and Completion. English horn peals resounded above the strings; pastoral and matter-of-fact, they echoed simpler days. Here the familiar E-flat major was less a reminder of extroverted heroics than a home of intimate, familial peace. A menacing disturbance burst out, but the solo violin dispelled this quickly with comforting, confiding gestures. The orchestra sank into a mollifying, healing peace, shades of uncertainty falling away to reconciliation. A solemn chorale of winds and brass painted a golden sunset in harmony.

All parts of the orchestra gleamed throughout the giant tone poem. In particular, the brass tackled Strauss’s fanfares, chorales, and stunning high notes bravely and successfully. Cole’s violin solos were a delight to watch, combining technical expertise with theatrical panache; around the strings executed their parts adroitly through wild frenzies and tranquil respites. The winds characterized brilliantly in solos and well-intoned group efforts, and percussion and harps did great work setting big dramatic moods. Together with his colleagues, Nelsons illuminated the mountains and valleys of Strauss’s score with passion and mastery.

And yet through all the chaos and clashes, somehow the different lines and voices came through to us with distinct identity and sharp focus — just as the many contrapuntal lines in Mozart’s symphony. Indeed, Strauss considered Mozart “the most sublime of all composers.” It is a fortune, then, to hear both artists considered in the same evening, presented in such commitment to dramatic character plus notewise accuracy and clarity. And above all, the BSO performed for us with genuine heart, a true honor to see and appreciate. The musicians of the BSO were our heroes of last night.

Julian Gau is a Boston-based freelancer and writer with a master’s degree in orchestral conducting from the Boston Conservatory. He serves as founder and conductor of the Horizon Ensemble, and resident conductor of the Chinese Music Ensemble of New York. He holds degrees in music and mathematics from Brown University.
Boston Symphony Orchestra at Symphony Hall, Thursday, Sept. 24 (Photo by Winslow Townson)

8 Comments »

8 Comments [leave a civil comment (others will be removed) and please disclose relevant affiliations]

  1. Lovely concert, as noted. Also as noted, the band might have taken a little room here and there. The Mozart tempi were well-judged and not to be abandoned, but there could have been a bit more relaxation in some phrases, or recognition of changes of voice as a new character entered the drama. Still, Nelsons is young, and not yet enchanted with the notion of chiaroscuro in music-making. Until he gets there, it is good to hear the BSO playing so precisely and with such good morale.

    Comment by Concordia — October 3, 2025 at 3:36 pm

  2. TO Bennet- It is exceedingly rare to repeat the development and recapitulation, therefore the omission is not worth mentioning.

    Comment by Lee Eiseman — October 2, 2025 at 10:12 am

  3. I have to somewhat concur with Cecilia regarding Nathan Cole’s performance in the Strauss. It was all very tasteful and well executed and lacking in character. Imho the violin solo should be played with at least a suggestion of schmaltz. I don’t think Ein Heldenleben benefits from being taken too seriously in it’s interpretation. After all, Strauss himself was clearly having some fun with it.

    But I certainly won’t be judging Mr. Cole based on this one performance. He’s got a much bigger test coming right up. I’m eagerly looking forward to the upcoming Missa Solemnis. I will be interested to hear how Mr. Cole does with what I consider one of the most profoundly beautiful pieces of music ever written.

    Comment by jimwm — September 29, 2025 at 5:42 pm

  4. First, how wonderful it is to be back in Symphony Hall – with new carpets and and paint. I do miss the plaques on the first floor listing major donors, and the gift shop kiosk on the second floor.
    The genius that is Mozart was unfortunately lost, especially the outer movements. Just because you can play fast doesn’t necessarily mean you should. Even with a Molto Allegro marking. I usually revel in Mozart’s workings in the last movement, but there was not time to enjoy them.
    I loved the Strauss, with the possible exception of the concertmaster solos. Yes they were mostly correct, but certainly not special. The fiddle doesn’t seem to speak very well, and what I do hear doesn’t say very much in Nathan Cole’s hands.

    Comment by Cecilia — September 29, 2025 at 1:48 pm

  5. I seem to be in the minority in finding the concert a reversion of Nelsons to loud, louder and ever louder. The were the obligatory pianissimo passages, but I left with an earache and a headache. Cole’s wonderful solos were often drowned out by the orchestra, and I hope this is not reversion to type by Nelsons. Fortissimos are not all there is to playing Strauss and Mozart. A smaller orchestra for the Jupiter would have been better.

    Comment by RSB — September 28, 2025 at 10:27 am

  6. I am not an expert on the score of Mozart’s Jupiter Symphony. However, when the Boston Symphony finished playing it, the final movement felt short to me. Jonathan Blumhofer in his review of the concert complains that Nelsons omitted the repeat of it’s second half. That would explain my feeling. Julian you didn’t mention that. If Jonathan is correct, I wonder why Nelsons did that. It was a great concert, but I too would have liked to have heard the final movement as it was written.

    Comment by Bennett — September 27, 2025 at 10:49 pm

  7. Thanks for the caption correction. Indeed the picture represents Thursday night’s concert.

    Comment by Lee Eiseman — September 27, 2025 at 2:31 pm

  8. A superb account of what sounds like a magical evening! I attended the Friday, September 26th performance, and it was outstanding – particularly the ‘Jupiter’ symphony. I don’t remember hearing the outer movements played so briskly, incisively, and in such thrilling fashion – not live nor on record. This was virtuosic orchestral playing, not to mention masterful conducting by Andris Nelsons (note spelling, editor!)

    One more tiny editorial miss: male players wear coats and neckties for Friday performances, not the white ties and tails featured in Winslow Townson’s photo just above. (Besides, my seat on Friday is visible in the picture, but that ain’t me, WT.)

    Comment by nimitta — September 27, 2025 at 2:21 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, this comment forum is now closed.